The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez U.S. District Court Judge
Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission") filed this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct alleged unlawful employment practices on the basis of religion and retaliation, and to provide appropriate relief to Luciano Cortez whom the Commission alleged was adversely affected by such practices. The Commission alleged that Defendant Sierra Pacific Industries ("Sierra Pacific") subjected Mr. Cortez to discrimination based on his religion and retaliation, in violation of Title VII, in that it failed to accommodate his religious beliefs and practices and instead discharged him because of his religion and/or in retaliation for his request for accommodation. Defendant has denied the Commission's allegations and claims. The Commission and Defendant Sierra Pacific now seek to resolve this action as to each other and as between Sierra Pacific and Luciano Cortez ("Charging Party") without further contested litigation through the instant Consent Decree. This resolution does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Sierra Pacific, nor constitute a finding on the allegations stated in the Commission's Complaint.
The Court has reviewed this Consent Decree in light of the pleadings, the record herein, and the applicable law, and now approves this Consent Decree.
THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to this action. This Court retains jurisdiction over this Consent Decree during its term.
2. This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final resolution of the Commission's claims against Sierra Pacific in this action.
3. This Consent Decree will become effective upon its entry by the Court. 4. This Consent Decree is final and binding upon the parties to it, their successors and assigns.
5. The Commission and Sierra Pacific will each bear its own costs and attorneys fees in this action.
GENERAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
6. Sierra Pacific and its current officers, agents, employees, and all persons in active concert or participation with them are enjoined to comply with all requirements of Title VII with respect to providing a work environment free from discrimination, including discrimination based on religion, and are enjoined from failing to provide reasonable accommodation to employees who request accommodation of their religious beliefs and practices, and from retaliating against employees who make such requests.
7. Sierra Pacific and its current officers, agents, employees, and all persons in active concert or participation with them are enjoined from retaliating against the Charging Party, or any other employee or former employee, for having testified or participated in any manner in the Commission's investigation and the proceedings in this case.
SPECIAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
8. Sierra Pacific will use an outside consultant, paid for by Sierra Pacific, to provide equal employment opportunity training to all plant managers and all human resources and personnel and benefits managers, specifically on the subjects of accommodation of religious beliefs and practices, anti-retaliation, and other forms of discrimination. Said training shall be held once per year during the term of this Consent Decree, such year to be measured from the entry of the Consent Decree in this matter, and shall be no less than two hours duration per session. Said training will include discussion of an employer's obligation to accommodate the religious beliefs and practices of its employees, an exploration of various forms of accommodation, and how to handle an employee's request for accommodation. Sierra Pacific agrees to provide the name of the entity or person selected to do the training, a description of the content of each training program, and a copy of any materials to be used during the training to counsel for the EEOC no later than twenty (20) days before the training programs are scheduled to be held. If the Commission has not objected to the entity ...