Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Smith v. Castro

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 30, 2008

JAMES E. SMITH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CASTRO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On October 28, 2008, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, explained the complaint's deficiencies, gave plaintiff 20 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The 20-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 15 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

20081230

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.