Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Majors

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 7, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WAYNE J. MAJORS, AKA JAY MAJORS, LEAH M. ANDERSON, AKA JENNIFER METZGER; AND SANDRA VILLEGAS, DEFENDANTS.

ORDER RESETTING TRIAL DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME

The above captioned case came on for a hearing in open court on Tuesday, January 6, 2009. Counsel for all the parties were present. The defendants were not present, waivers of appearances having been filed.

Government counsel stated that he had been informed by counsel for defendant Majors that Mr. Majors has become seriously ill with a respiratory illness that necessitates substantial on-going treatment. These physical problems have been represented to result in cognitive deficiencies which make it difficult for Mr. Majors to engage in plea negotiations and could potentially make it a problem for Mr. Majors to stand trial. Counsel for defendant Majors has provided government counsel with some medical records/information which support the above respresentations.

The government needs time to evaluate the validity of the medical claims. Counsel for defendant Majors has agreed to obtain the necessary medial (privacy) waivers from his client so that government counsel and government medical personnel can obtain and evaluate the validity of the claimed illness. It is anticipated that the government would either use internal resources (e.g., U.S. Bureau of Prison personnel who can review the medical records - hopefully without the need to actually examine the defendant) and/or outside retained medical personnel (e.g., within Arizona where defendant Majors resides). These experts would be asked to determine the extent of the defendant's physical problems, likelihood that the defendant would be physically well enough to participate (i.e., assist his attorney and testify if he desires to do so) in a criminal trial anticipated to last 3 to 4 weeks, and, if convicted, well enough to serve a potential prison sentence without life threatening consequences.

To accomplish the above, the government requested that the current February 24, 209, trial date be continued. All defense counsel agreed with the request. A new trial date of April 14, 2009, at 10:30 a.m., was agreed upon by all the parties, with a trial confirmation date of March 24, 2009, at 9:15 a.m. It was also agreed that time would be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from January 6, 2009, until April 14, 2009, based on the exclusion contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(A) (delay resulting from examination to determine the mental or physical capacity of defendant).

It is SO ORDERED.

20090107

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.