IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 8, 2009
MIGUEL CASTANEDA, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
BURGER KING CORPORATION AND BURGER KING HOLDINGS, INC., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: William Alsup United States District Judge
ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF CERTAIN DISCOVERY
The Court regrets that counsel for the moving party cancelled the hearing on the discovery dispute matter set for January 9, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. It turns out that there is no convenient date in the foreseeable future due to an extremely heavy trial calendar since last November and continuing through June 2009. As a result, this matter will have to be heard when it was originally noticed, namely FEBRUARY 12,2009, AT 8:00 A.M. Due to a clerical error, the telephone notice of January 7 renoticing the hearing for January 12 (at counsel's request) is no longer available. Plaintiff's opposition is due on January 22 and the reply is due January 29. The Court regrets that it is so pressed with other matters and it will give consideration to referring all discovery matters to a magistrate judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.