Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Castaneda v. Burger King Corp.

January 8, 2009

MIGUEL CASTANEDA, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BURGER KING CORPORATION AND BURGER KING HOLDINGS, INC., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: William Alsup United States District Judge

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF CERTAIN DISCOVERY

The Court regrets that counsel for the moving party cancelled the hearing on the discovery dispute matter set for January 9, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. It turns out that there is no convenient date in the foreseeable future due to an extremely heavy trial calendar since last November and continuing through June 2009. As a result, this matter will have to be heard when it was originally noticed, namely FEBRUARY 12,2009, AT 8:00 A.M. Due to a clerical error, the telephone notice of January 7 renoticing the hearing for January 12 (at counsel's request) is no longer available. Plaintiff's opposition is due on January 22 and the reply is due January 29. The Court regrets that it is so pressed with other matters and it will give consideration to referring all discovery matters to a magistrate judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090108

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.