The opinion of the court was delivered by: Terry J. Hatter, Jr. United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUPERIOR COURT, OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. The Court's review having been completed, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein;
(2) The access to courts claims alleged in the Complaint are dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice;
(3) The claims challenging nondisclosure of impeachment material alleged in the Complaint are dismissed without leave to amend, with prejudice as to defendants Justice Carlos Moreno, Gil Garcetti, Carlos Vazquez, Irene Wakabayashi, Daniel Lungren, Lauren Dana, David Voet, and the Los Angeles County Superior Court, and without prejudice as to defendants Alan Sharpe, Thomas Garvin, and L. Hargrove; and
(4) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice as against defendants Sharpe, Garvin, and Hargrove, and with prejudice as against defendants Moreno, Garcetti, Vazquez, Wakabayashi, Lungren, Dana, Voet, the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Grannis, Yarborough, Duncan, Monteiro, Reinhart, and Boetsch.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on plaintiff.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...