Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gray v. City of West Sacramento

January 9, 2009

GARY S. GRAY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled admiralty action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 15, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days, and any reply was to be filed within ten days after the filing of objections. Plaintiff filed timely objections, and defendant filed a timely reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 15, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's November 4, 2008 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 9) is granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); and

3. This action is dismissed with prejudice.

20090109

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.