UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 9, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
FIDEL SANCHEZ-ELIZONDO, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTIONS SCHEDULE AND HEARING; ORDER
Date: February 9, 2009
Time: 9:00 a.m.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that a new motions schedule for any response and reply filings be set as follows: any response to defendant's previously filed motion shall be filed by January 20, 2009, any reply shall be filed by February 2, 2009, and the motions hearing now set for February 2, 2009, may be continued to February 9, 2009, at 9 a.m.
The reason for the continuance is for further consideration of motions filed and any further potential plea offer from the government and plea negotiations between the parties. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel may have reasonable time necessary for plea negotiations and preparation. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). The parties agree that the delay from the continuance shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(iv).
The intervening period of delay shall be excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(8)(A) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.