IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 13, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT,
KAMALJIT SINGH KHERA, MOVANT.
Movant, a federal prisoner with counsel, has filed a motion to vacate, correct or set aside his sentence. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On August 5, 2008, the court denied movant's motion to seal the § 2255 motion, but directed movant to file a new motion to seal explaining the legal basis for the motion.
On August 19, 2008, however, movant filed a motion to unseal his § 2255 motion and the exhibits filed in support of that motion, explaining that he never wanted to file those documents under seal. On September 2, 2008, respondent moved for an extension of time to file a response and on September 15, 2008, respondent filed its response to the motion to unseal, stating that the government does not oppose unsealing the pleadings at this time, but requests that it be granted leave to seek a sealing order as to future pleadings if the need arises.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Respondent's September 2, 2008, motion for extension of time is granted;
2. Respondent's September 15, 2008, notice of non-opposition is deemed timely filed; and,
3. There being no apparent reasons for the document to remain under seal, movant's August 19, 2008, motion to unseal is granted and the Clerk of the Court is directed to unseal docket number 348. Movant subsequently filed, under seal, an amended § 2255 motion with exhibits and has not addressed whether those documents should be sealed. Accordingly, movant is further ordered to file, within fifteen days of this order, a motion to seal or a motion to unseal docket numbers 352 and 353.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.