Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cummings v. Sacramento Dist. Court

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 14, 2009

SHERMAN CUMMINGS, PETITIONER,
v.
SACRAMENTO DISTRICT COURT, RESPONDENT.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 22, 2008, the court dismissed the petition with leave to file an amended petition within thirty days. That order warned petitioner that failure to timely file an amended petition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The thirty days have passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to that order.*fn1

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; L. R. 11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.