Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Anderson v. Talisman

January 20, 2009

RODOLFO C. ANDERSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DR. TALISMAN, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur L. Alarcón United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

This Amended Scheduling Order replaces and supercedes the Scheduling Order entered on January 8, 2009 (Doc. No. 32).

On December 15, 2008, Defendant, Dr. Talisman ("Defendant"), filed an Answer (Doc. No. 31) in response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 27). On January 20, 2009, Defendant filed a motion for leave to file an amended answer (Doc. No. 34). This Court gave Plaintiff, Rodolfo C. Anderson ("Plaintiff") until February 10, 2009 to file a response, if any. If this Court grants the Defendant's motion to amend the answer, it will not impact the dates in this Amended Scheduling Order.

Pursuant to Rules 1, 16, and 26-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, discovery shall proceed in accordance with this order. Additionally, a schedule for this litigation is set forth below.

Should this matter proceed to trial, the parties are required to file pretrial statements. In addition to the matters required to be addressed in the pretrial statement in accordance with Local Rule 16-281, Plaintiff will be required to make a particularized showing in the pretrial statement to obtain the attendance of witnesses at trial. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the procedures set forth below may result in the preclusion of any and all witnesses named in the pretrial statement.

At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff's responsibility to produce all of the evidence to prove the claims, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or witness testimony. If Plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must follow certain procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify.

I. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Testify Voluntarily

An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot come to court unless this Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness to be transported to court. This Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that:

1. The prospective witness is willing to attend; and

2. The prospective witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts.

With the pretrial statement, a party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file a written motion for a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The motion must:

1. State the name, CDCR Identification number, and address of each such witness; and

2. Be accompanied by affidavits showing that each witness is willing to testify and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways:

1. The party can swear by affidavit that the prospective witness has informed the party that he is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed. The party must state in the affidavit when and where the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.