Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brady v. Kelper

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 21, 2009

BILL BRADY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MIKE KELPER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action regarding seizure of cattle. Pending before the court is defendants' motion for summary judgment, on calendar for oral argument on January 29, 2009. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, any opposition "to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed with the Clerk not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date." See Local Rule 78-230(c). The local rules further provide that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." Id.

Accordingly, and pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(h), the hearing scheduled for January 29, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California, is hereby taken off calendar and the matter is submitted on the record and briefs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090121

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.