Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Anderson v. Talisman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 21, 2009

RODOLFO C. ANDERSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DR. TALISMAN, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur L. Alarcón United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation

ORDER

On January 20, 2009, Plaintiff Rodolfo C. Anderson ("Plaintiff") filed a reply to Defendant Dr. Talisman's answer (Doc. No. 35) ("Reply"). In this Reply, Plaintiff requests this Court (1) grant summary judgment for Plaintiff, (2) award compensatory and punitive damages to Plaintiff, (3) set a date for discovery, and (4) grant any other relief the Court deems proper.

On January 20, 2009, this Court issued an amended scheduling order. The Amended Scheduling Order allowed the parties to commence discovery and contained the discovery cutoff date. Thus, Plaintiff's request that the Court set a date for discovery is moot. Further, this Court will entertain motions for summary judgment following the completion of discovery.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's request that the court set a date for discovery is DENIED as moot, and Plaintiff's request for summary judgment and damages is DENIED without prejudice.

20090121

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.