Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Liljestrand v. Silberberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 21, 2009

JOHN ERIC LILJESTRAND AND CHRISTIE LILJESTRAND, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MERVYN ISIDORE SILBERBERG AND DOES I THROUGH X, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS,

ORDER/ AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

After considering the arguments of counsel on plaintiffs motion to exclude defendant's expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c)(1), the court concludes that modification of the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order is the most appropriate resolution of this matter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) discovery is reopened for the limited purposes enumerated herein;

(1) the parties shall disclose expert witnesses and their reports by no later than February 17, 2009;

(2) the parties shall disclose rebuttal expert witnesses and their reports by no later than March 17, 2009;

(3) the parties shall complete depositions of all expert witnesses by no later than May 1, 2009;

(4) the parties shall file Pretrial Statements by no later than May 15, 2009;

(5) the Final Pretrial Conference is rescheduled for June 15, 2009, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom No. 5;

(6) the jury trial is rescheduled for August 11, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 5; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to exclude experts be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

20090121

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.