Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Puente-Hudson v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 23, 2009

MARCO DE PUENTE-HUDSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DERRAL G. ADAMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT (Doc. 7)

On October 17, 2008, Plaintiff Marco De Puente-Hudson filed a motion seeking an order setting forth any pending deadlines. In a separate order issued concurrently with this order, the Court directed Plaintiff to either file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed against Defendant Adams on his cognizable First Amendment claim. Plaintiff has a thirtyday deadline pursuant to that screening order.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for notification of any pending deadlines is moot in light of the issuance of the screening order and is HEREBY DENIED on that ground.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090123

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.