Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mack v. Ona

January 26, 2009

ANTHONY E. MACK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MARSHA ONA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On November 21, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.*fn1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 21, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 45) is granted in part and denied in part;

3. Defendant Baroya's motion to dismiss (Doc. 50) is denied;

4. Defendant Hynum's motion to dismiss (Doc. 53) is granted;

5. Defendant Centeno's motion to dismiss (Doc. 70) for failure to state a claim and statute of limitations is denied;

6. Defendants' motions to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiff's claims are barred by the statute of limitations are granted, without leave to amend, as to those claims arising prior to October 24, 2001;

7. Defendants Hollie, Krossa, Lucine, Parkinson, Thor, Ona, Parker and Hynum, referred to as the SVSP defendants, are dismissed from this action, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate these individuals as defendants to this action;

8. Defendants' motions to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiff's claims are barred by the statute of limitations are denied as to those claims arising after October 24, 2001;

9. Defendant Moor is dismissed from this action for plaintiff's failure to substitute pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1), and the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.