IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 2, 2009
MICHAEL LUCAS, PETITIONER,
JAMES HARTLEY, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: William M. Wunderlich United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus "in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A habeas corpus petition is the correct method for a prisoner to challenge "the very fact or duration of his confinement," and where "the relief he seeks is a determination that he is entitled to immediate release or a speedier release from that imprisonment." Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489 (1973). In contrast, a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is the proper method for a prisoner to challenge the conditions of that confinement. In this case, Petitioner is not challenging his conviction, but rather is challenging prison conditions regarding his ability to practice his religion. Accordingly, the proper vehicle for Petitioner to pursue his claims is through a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Based on the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1) The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner's right to file an appropriate civil rights action; and
2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.