Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Howard v. Spearman

February 3, 2009

DARYL K. HOWARD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
M.E. SPEARMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur L. Alarcón United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation

ORDER

Plaintiff Daryl Howard is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff also proceeds in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 13).

Defendants have filed two separate motions to dismiss (Docs. 38, 43) and this Court gave Plaintiff until February 3, 2009 to file his responses. (Doc. 48.) Plaintiff has instead filed an application for an extension of time, asserting that he is presently housed in administrative segregation and requires additional time to research and prepare his responses. The Court will permit a brief extension of time and will grant Plaintiff's request. Plaintiff will have until Friday, March 6, 2009 to respond to both of Defendants' motions to dismiss. The Court cautions Plaintiff that no further requests for extensions of time will be considered.

20090203

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.