The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE STATUS CONFERENCE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED (and respectfully requested) by and between plaintiffs and all defendants, by and through their designated counsel, that the Case Status Conference scheduled for February 6, 2009, be continued to April 17, 2009 or such later date as may be convenient to the Court.
Good cause is that this stipulated continuance will serve the interests of the parties and judicial comity by rescheduling the case status conference until after the plaintiff's underlying criminal case is resolved. It is plaintiffs' counsel's understanding that the factually-related criminal matter will be dismissed at the next state court date. The plaintiff's next state court date is scheduled to occur March 2009. Once the criminal case is finally resolved, the parties will be in a position to determine what causes of action, if any, are appropriate to proceed upon. Taking defendants' counsel's calendar into account, the parties respectfully suggest that the Case Management Conference be continued to April 17, 2009 at 10:30 a.m.
In light of the foregoing, the parties respectfully request the case status conference be held on April 17, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. or such other date as may be convenient for the Court.
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS ADANTÉ D. POINTER, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SEAN FRANCIS McCLOSKEY, LAIALA McCLOSKEY, and DM
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE TOM BLAKE, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants M.E. COURTNIER and J. WHITE
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE CASE STATUS CONFERENCE CURRENTLY SET FOR FEBRUARY 6, 2009, BE CONTINUED TO APRIL 17, 2009 at 10:30 a.m..
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...