Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Green

February 5, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THOMAS EDWARD GREEN, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: James Ware United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SEARCH MOTION TO SUPPRESS BASED ON WARRANT TERMS; ORDER FOLLOWING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

On February 4, 2009, the Court conducted a hearing on Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Docket Item No. 68) and a Final Pretrial Conference. Counsel for the respective parties were present. In light of the discussion at the conference, the Court orders as follows:

(1) For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant's Motion to Suppress is DENIED.

(2) On or before February 10, 2009, the parties shall file and serve their motions in limine in preparation for trial.

A. Trial Schedule

Jury Selection February 17, 2009 at 9 a.m.

Session 1 February 17, 2009, 1 p.m. - 4 p.m.

Sessions 2-5 February 18 - 19, 2009, 9 a.m. - 12 p.m.; 1 p.m. - 4 p.m.

Argue & Submit February 20, 2009 at 9 a.m.

Jury Deliberations February 20, 2009 at 1 p.m.; February 23 - 24, 2009

B. Jury Selection

1. The entire panel will be sworn. The Court will inform the panel of the nature and duration of the case and ask any panel member to identify himself or herself if, due to the nature or duration of the case or any physical or personal problem, service would impose an extreme hardship. The Court will examine panel members claiming hardship and issue appropriate excuses.

2. The Clerk will call the names of all prospective jurors. Fourteen jurors will be seated in the jury box, and the others will be seated in the courtroom in the order in which their names are called.

3. The Court will conduct voir dire of the prospective jurors, including any Court-approved questions which have been previously submitted by counsel.

4. After the Court has completed voir dire, counsel may be permitted to conduct supplemental voir dire for a time period specified by the Court. After the completion of voir dire, the Court will inquire whether the panel is passed for cause. If a party objects to the qualifications of any seated juror, the party shall indicate that the panel is not passed and ask for permission to approach the bench to inform the Court. A party shall not identify the juror or state the ground for its challenge on the record with the panel present unless permission to state the challenge has been granted by the Court. At the bench conference the Court will determine a procedure for hearing the challenge. If a party does not ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.