Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re California Title Insurance Antitrust Litigation

February 5, 2009

IN RE CALIFORNIA TITLE INSURANCE ANTITRUST LITIGATION


The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Jeffrey S. White

CLASS ACTION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS OF PLAINTIFFS' CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Date: March 13, 2009

Place: Courtroom 2

Company of Florida, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Security Union Title Insurance Title Insurance Company, United General Title Insurance Company, Commonwealth Land Title Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Stewart Title Insurance Company, and Old Republic National Consolidated Class Action Complaint (Doc. 100) (hereafter, "Defendants' Joint Motion to WHEREAS, on January 20, 2009, Defendant Old Republic International Corporation filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 101) (hereafter, "Old Republic's Motion to Dismiss");

WHEREAS on January 20, 2009, Defendants Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Ticor Title Insurance Company, Ticor Title Insurance Company, National Title Insurance of New York, First American Corporation, First American Insurance Company, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Transnation Title Insurance Company,

Title Insurance Company (collectively, "Defendants"), filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Dismiss");

WHEREAS, on January 21, 2009, the Court issued an order setting a briefing schedule on Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss and on Old Republic's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 102), directing that Plaintiffs file their memoranda of points and authorities in opposition to Defendants' respective motions to dismiss on or before February 6, 2009;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have met and conferred with Defendants on a proposal by Plaintiffs to submit a single consolidated memorandum in opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion to Plaintiffs for relief from the Court's standing order regarding the length of legal memoranda to be filed in support of or in opposition to any motion, to permit the filing of a single consolidated opposition memorandum of no more than pages in length;

Dismiss and Old Republic's Motion to Dismiss, and have also met and conferred on a request by

WHEREAS, Defendants do not oppose a request by Plaintiffs for an order permitting Plaintiffs to file a single consolidated memorandum of point and authorities in opposition to both motions, and Defendants also do not oppose Plaintiffs' request for relief from the Court's standing order to permit the filing of a single consolidated memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss and Old Republic's Motion to Dismiss, not to exceed 25 pages in length; and

WHEREAS, Defendant Old Republic International Corporation reserves its right to file a separate reply memorandum of law in further support of Old Republic's Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs acknowledge Old Republic International Corporation's right to do so;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel, and subject to Court approval, that Plaintiffs may seek relief from the Court's standing order and, subject to Court approval and said relief being granted, Plaintiffs may file and serve a single consolidated memorandum in opposition to Defendants' Joint ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.