IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 10, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
CLARENCE AUSTIN HOLMES, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Edward J. Garcia United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESET MOTION SCHEDULE
The United States of America, through its counsels of record, Lawrence G. Brown, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and William S. Wong, Assistant United States Attorney, and the defendant Clarence Austin Holmes, through his counsel, Mary French, Assistant Federal Defender, stipulate and agree to the following revised motion schedule regarding the defendant's motion currently set for February 27, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.:
1. Government's opposition shall be filed no later than March 11, 2009;
2. Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed no later than March 20, 2009; and
3. Non-evidentiary hearing set for March 27, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.
Counsel for the government needs additional time to research and prepare its responses to the defendant's motions. Additionally, counsel for the government was ill with the flu from December 24, 2008, and was in and out of the office for about 2 1/2 to 3 weeks. Furthermore, the parties are attempting to resolve the case by plea agreement. Accordingly, the parties stipulate to the revised law and motion schedule.
Additionally, the parties agree that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) - Local Code T-4 - reasonable time to prepare and for continuity of counsel, and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) - Local Code E - pending motion. The parties agree that time be excluded under these provisions for the reasons stated above from February 27, 2009, to and including March 27, 2009.
Good cause having been shown, it is hereby ordered that the revised motion schedule is adopted and that time should be excluded under Local Code T-4 and Local Code E from February 27, 2009, to and including March 27, 2009.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.