UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 11, 2009
JAMES MORRIS JACKSON, PLAINTIFF,
STEPHEN E. KNIGHT, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge United States District Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN APPEAL FORMA PAUPERIS ON
Plaintiff James Morris Jackson filed a notice of appeal and a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis ("IFP") on February 9, 2009. (Doc. Nos. 18, 19.) Plaintiff was granted IFP status on October 29, 2008. (Doc. No. 9.) Normally, when a litigant is granted leave to proceed IFP by the district court, this status carries over in the Court of Appeals. FED.R.APP.P. 24(a). However, if the district court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith, the litigant must reapply to the Court of Appeals to proceed IFP on appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); FED.R.APP.P. 24(a). The Court dismissed without leave to amend Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). (Doc. No. 9 at 8.) Because the Court concluded that any amendment of Plaintiff's complaint would be futile, the Court determines that this appeal is not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.