Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Perez v. Scribner

February 11, 2009

TOMAS PEREZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SCRIBNER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: William M. Wunderlich United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER RE MOTION (DOC 17)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983.

On July 31, 2008, an order was entered, finding that the complaint stated a claim as to certain defendants and directing Plaintiff to complete and return to the court forms for service of process on those defendants. On November 3, 2008, Defendants filed a motion requesting a new screening order. Defendants note that the screening order referred to defendants not named in the complaint. Further, the order directs service of process upon defendants without a finding that the complaint states a claim against them. A review of the order reveals that it was entered in error.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for a new screening order is granted

1. The July 31, 2008, screening order is vacated.

2. A new screening order will issued. The defendants who have appeared in this action will be directed to respond to the complaint, if appropriate, by a separate screening order which will issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090211

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.