IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 11, 2009
ANTHONY BERNARD SMITH, PETITIONER,
B. CURRY, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.
On August 3, 2007, the district court granted the underlying habeas petition on one ground but denied it in all other respects. Respondent filed a notice of appeal and petitioner, through counsel appointed on March 20, 2007, filed a cross-appeal. The case was submitted after argument on December 10, 2008. See Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Case Nos. 07-16875 & 07-16876.
Acting in pro per, petitioner has now filed a petition for a writ of mandate and declaratory relief, asking this court to direct the Sacramento County Superior Court to correct his abstract of judgment to reflect the order of the district court. However, because petitioner is represented by counsel, this court will not consider his pro per pleading.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandate and declaratory relief (docket no. 80) is hereby denied.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.