PARTIES' STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON PARTIES' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THERETO
Plaintiffs Conservation Congress, Citizens for Better Forestry, Mary Lee Steffensen, and Karen Wilson (collectively Plaintiffs) and the United States Forest Service ("Service"), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request the following.
1. On January 20, 2009, the parties submitted their Joint Status Report proposing a briefing schedule and hearing date specially-set for April 17, 2009 for the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551, et seq. that the Service's East Fork II Project violates the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1600, et seq., and the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321, et seq.
2. On January 21, 2009, the Service filed the Administrative Record ("AR") with the Court. The AR was previously served on Plaintiffs on January 15, 2009.
3. On January 23, 2009, the Court issued its Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order that adopted the parties' proposed briefing schedule, and set a hearing date of April 20, 2009.
4. Counsel for Plaintiffs has a conflict with that date. Accordingly, based on the availability of counsel for Plaintiffs and Court's calendar, Plaintiffs have proposed continuing the hearing to May 4, 2009. The Service does not oppose to Plaintiffs request.
5. In light of Plaintiffs' request, and assuming the Court continues the hearing on the parties' cross-motions to May 4, 2009, it would be in the interests of the parties and the Court to continue the briefing schedule one additional week with the following dates:
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment February 23, 2009
Service's opposition and cross-motion for March 16, 2009 summary judgment Plaintiff's reply in support of their motion March 30, 2009 and their opposition to the Service's cross-motion
Service's reply in support of its cross- April 13, 2009 motion Hearing before the Court May 4, 2009 This schedule will afford the parties additional time to further prepare their briefs based on a voluminous AR, and will still leave the matter fully briefed approximately three weeks before the hearing on May 4, 2009.
6. This is the parties' first request to continue the briefing scheduling in this matter. STIPULATION AND REQUEST
Based on the foregoing and for good cause showing, the PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST THAT the briefing schedule set forth in the Court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall be CONTINUED one additional week for all dates, and that the hearing be continued to May 4, 2009.