STIPULATION FOR ORDER EXTENDING FILING OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [proposed] ORDER
Plaintiff MAGGIE FRANKLIN and Defendants SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY, and the CITY OF SACRAMENTO, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an order granting an extension of time for plaintiff to file her opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment, and for defendants to file their reply brief.
Good cause exists to extend the filing of plaintiff's opposition in that Lawrence D. Murray, counsel for plaintiff, has been ill for several days, was diagnosed with a viral lung infection today by Dr. Michael Sdao, is expected to be ill for at least several more days, and therefore unable to work at all. A copy of Dr. Sdao's verification is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Furthermore, Mr. Murray's associate, Keith Howard, was unable to work on this opposition for several days due to an unexpected trip to Florida to assist his father who underwent surgery and was diagnosed with cancer.
The parties have agreed and stipulated to the following briefing schedule regarding defendants' motion for summary judgment:
Brief Current Due Date New Due Date
Opposition February 17, 2009 February 20, 2009 Reply February 23, 2009 March 3, 2009 The hearing date for defendants' motion for summary judgment is March 2, 2009. The parties further stipulate to continuing the hearing on defendants' motion for summary judgment to March 16, 2009.
IT IS SO ORDERED: Good cause appearing: Plaintiff Maggie Franklin's opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before February 20, 2009. Defendants' reply brief shall be filed on or before March 3, 2009. The hearing on defendants' motion for summary judgment is continued to March 16, 2009, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 5.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...