Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Campbell v. Price Waterhouse Coopers

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 17, 2009

JASON CAMPBELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS, LLP, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows U.S. Magistrate Judge

Presently before the court is defendant's ex parte application for order shortening time to hear its motion to compel depositions of absent class members.*fn1 Plaintiffs have filed an opposition.

Defendant proposes a briefing schedule for its motion to compel, requiring a joint statement on February 17, 2009, and a hearing date of February 19, 2009. At the time of the instant order, the district court had not yet ruled on defendant's separate ex parte application to extend the discovery cutoff, which is currently February 20, 2009. Because it would be impossible to approve defendant's proposed schedule and comply with the current discovery deadline, defendant's ex parte application for order shortening time, (docket #s 358, 359), is denied without prejudice to its renewal if the district court approves the proposed extension of the discovery deadline.*fn2

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.