Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pai Corp. v. Integrated Science Solutions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 18, 2009

PAI CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
INTEGRATED SCIENCE SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

Before the Court is defendants' "Ex Parte Application for Stay of Enforcement of Judgment Pending Determination of Defendants' Motion for New Trial and Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law," filed February 17, 2009. Having read and considered the application and the papers filed in support thereof, the Court hereby DENIES the application without prejudice, for the reason that defendants have failed to propose any terms for the posting of security to protect plaintiff's interest in the judgment or to explain why such security should not be required herein. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b) (providing "[o]n appropriate terms for the opposing party's security, the court may stay the execution of a judgment" pending disposition of motions for, inter alia, a new trial or judgment as a matter of law).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge

20090218

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.