ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
The Court, having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal, filed concurrently herewith:
This action is dismissed by Plaintiff in its entirety with prejudice as to Plaintiff, Manuel Medrano, and without prejudice as to the claims of any potential or putative class, which excludes Medrano as a member;
The Class, previously certified by this Court on October 15, 2007, is de-certified for the purpose of this dismissal;
Parties shall each bear his or its own respective costs and attorneys' fees in connection with the Lawsuit; and
This dismissal is made pursuant to Rule 41(a) or (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 269 West Bonita Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711.
On August 4, 2008, I served the foregoing document described as: [ Proposed] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL [ ] by placing the true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows:
[X] by placing [ ] the original [X] a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows:
[SEE ATTACHED MAILING LIST]
[X] I deposited each envelope in the mail at Claremont, California.*fn1 The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.
[X] As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the United States Post Office on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Claremont, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postage ...