Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Locket v. Ives

February 23, 2009

MELVIN D. LOCKET, PETITIONER,
v.
RICHARD B. IVES, RESPONDENT.



ORDER

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a document he calls an application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner challenges a conviction he suffered in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Because petitioner challenges his conviction, his application must be construed as an application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Porter v. Adams, 244 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2001). Section 2255 applications must be heard in the district where the conviction and sentence were entered.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(a). For these reasons, the court will order that this action be transferred to Minnesota.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

20090223

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.