The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary Allen Feess U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER MONTH DAY YEAR
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 2 23 2009
X WITH COUNSEL Roger J Rosen , Retained
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: BULK CASH SMUGGLING in violation of 31 U.S.C. Section 5332(a)(1) as charged in Count 1 of the Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of PROBATION.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100 , which is due immediately to the Clerk of Court.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $5,000, which shall bear interest as provided by law.
Restitution shall be paid in full on or before July 31, 2009.
The defendant shall be placed on Probation for a term of three (3) years under the following terms and conditions:
1) The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
2) During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
3) The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant; and,
4) The defendant shall apply monies received from income tax refunds greater than $500, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments, and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation;
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
Defendant informed that he has waived his right to appeal.
On the Government's motion, all remaining count of the underlying indictment are ordered dismissed Bond is exonerated.
In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, may issue a warrant and revoke supervision for a violation occurring during the supervision period.
It is ordered that the Clerk deliver a copy of this Judgment and Probation/Commitment Order to the U.S. ...