Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Veil v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 3, 2009

DEBORAH VEIL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC. PLAN #501, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Deborah Veil ("Plaintiff") filed her Complaint in this matter on January 29, 2009. Service was made on Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential") on February 5, 2009 with a response to the Complaint then due February 25, 2009. Defendant Long Term Disability Coverage for All Employees of AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Plan #501 ("AT&T Plan") has not been served but now waives service of summons as part of the parties' stipulation.

For good cause showing, the court hereby GRANTS the parties' joint motion. (Doc. No. 6.) Prudential shall have a 30-day extension of time in which to respond to the Complaint. Prudential and the AT&T Plan shall therefore file and serve responsive pleadings on or before March 27, 2009.

20090303

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.