IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 3, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
MIGUEL RAMIREZ GONZALEZ DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING Date: 3/6/09 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Kyle F. Reardon, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Miguel Ramirez Gonzalez, John R. Manning Esq., that the judgment and sentencing presently set for March 6,2009 be continued to March 13, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., thus vacating the presently set judgment and sentencing.
Counsel for the parties agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) (continuity of counsel/ reasonable time for effective preparation) and Local Code T4, and agree to exclude time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the judgment and sentencing, March 13, 2009.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the March 6, 2009 judgment and sentencing be continued to March 13, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. I find that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendant's need for continuity of counsel and reasonable time for effective preparation, exceeds the public interest in a trial within 70 days. THEREFORE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 from the date of this order to March 13, 2009.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.