UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 4, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
ROBERT BOURSEAU, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable George H. King United States District Judge
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby adopts as findings of fact and conclusions of law the stipulation by the United States and defendant Robert Bourseau, and finds that the interests of justice outweigh the defendant's and the public's right to a speedy trial for the reasons stated herein.
The Court therefore FINDS AND ORDERS as follows:
1. For purposes of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period from March 2, 2009 to April 27, 2009, is excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(8)(A), 3161(h)(8)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendant's request without government objection, on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
2. Nothing in this order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable.
3. Defendant shall appear for the status conference on April 27, 2009, at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 650 of the United States District Court, located at 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.