Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Aidnik v. Knolls

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 5, 2009

JEFF C. AIDNIK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MIKE KNOLLS ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Susan P. Graber United States Circuit Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner who is proceeding pro se. He seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon comparison of this complaint with the complaint in Aidnik v. California Medical Facility, No. CIV S-08-2583-HDM-RAM,*fn1 the court deems the complaint in this case to be a request to file a supplemental pleading in the original case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d). The cases are brought by the same plaintiff, concern overlapping facts and events, and assert similar claims for relief. See Cabrera v. City of Huntington Park, 159 F.3d 374, 382 (9th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (holding that, at the court's discretion, a party may file a supplemental complaint containing claims that accrued after the initial complaint was filed). The court therefore GRANTS the request.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court shall file the complaint and addendum to the complaint herein as supplemental pleadings in Aidnik v. California Medical Facility, No. CIV S-08-2583-HDMRAM.

2. This case is hereby DISMISSED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.