IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 6, 2009
DENNIS HART, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
CITY OF ALAMEDA, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
STRIKE DEFENDANT'S SUR-REPLY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PERMISSION TO FILE FURTHER DECLARATIONS AND ANALYSIS
Before the Court is plaintiffs' "Objections and Request to Strike Defendant's Sur- Reply or, in the Alternative, for Permission to File Further Declarations and Analysis," filed February 27, 2009. Defendant has filed a declaration in opposition to plaintiffs' request. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the request, the Court finds defendant's response to plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues was not inconsistent with any order or direction of the Court made at the July 17, 2008 Case Management Conference. Further, plaintiffs, in their reply filed February 17, 2009, appear to have responded to all of the arguments made in defendant's filing of February 6, 2009 and have made no specific showing with respect to any additional arguments or declarations they would provide if given leave to expand their briefing. Accordingly, plaintiffs' request is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.