Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Jeon

March 9, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
HA LIM JEON SOCIAL SECURITY NO. NONE (LAST 4 DIGITS)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Andrew J. Guilford U. S. District Judge

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date.

03/09/2009

X WITH COUNSEL Craig Wilke, DFPD

(Name of Counsel)

X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Mail Fraud, Aiding and Abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 2 as charged in Count 3 of the Indictment

The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100.00, which is due

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $1,029,086.26, under 18 U.S.C. §

The amount of restitution ordered shall be paid as follows:

 Amount Washington Mutual Bank$925,841.89 Bank of America$56,618.72 Wells Fargo Bank$46,625.65

If the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall receive approximately proportional payment unless another priority order or percentage payment is specified in this judgment.

Nominal monthly payments of at least $25 shall be made during the period of supervised release. These payments shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision. Nominal restitution payments are ordered as the court finds that the defendant's economic circumstances do not allow for either immediate or future payment of the amount ordered.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), interest on the restitution ordered is waived because the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. Payments may be subject to penalties for default and delinquency under 18

The defendant shall be held jointly and severally liable with, if convicted, co-defendants Brandon Che Le and Hae Joo Lee for the amount of restitution ordered in this judgment.

The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.

All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine in addition to

Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Ha Lim Jeon, is hereby committed on Count 3 of the 17-Count Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of time served. (Release #D8512 written).

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years under the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.