Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Taylor v. Sistom

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 9, 2009

FRANK TAYLOR, PETITIONER,
v.
D.K. SISTO, ET. AL., RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas corpus proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the instant case, judgment has been entered and petitioner's appeal to the Ninth Circuit has been processed. The motion for appointment of counsel will be denied without prejudice to its renewal in the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's March 2, 2009 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to its renewal in the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

20090309

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.