Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ryles v. Felker

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 9, 2009

AMOS RYLES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
T. FELKER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 12, 2008, defendant Smith moved to dismiss this action on the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust available administrative remedies before filing suit. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e; Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). On January 20, 2009, the court found that notice of the requirements for filing an opposition or statement of no opposition to a motion to dismiss had been served on plaintiff. However, plaintiff had not filed an opposition or statement of no opposition to the motion to dismiss. Also, the court set out its authority to dismiss an action with or without prejudice if a party disobeys an order or the applicable rules of court, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), giving plaintiff 20 days to file either an opposition to defendant's motion or a statement of no opposition.

The 20-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of no opposition to the motion to dismiss, or otherwise responded to the January 20, 2009, order. This action must be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

20090309

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.