The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edward J. Garcia United States District Judge
GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR FURTHER ORDER EFFECTUATING REVOCATION OF DEFENDANT'S CITIZENSHIP AND ORDER
On March 14, 2005, the court issued an order under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 revoking the defendant's citizenship. The government now respectfully moves for a further order effectuating that revocation.
A jury convicted the defendant on April 14, 2004 of committing fraud to obtain naturalization, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a). The court sentenced him on March 11, 2005. His release date, according to the Bureau of Prisons website, is July 2, 2009.
On March 14, 2005, the Court ordered that the final order admitting the defendant to citizenship be revoked, set aside, and declared void. The Court further ordered cancelled the certificate of naturalization issued to him on May 31, 2001. Finally, the Court ordered him to surrender his original certificate of naturalization to the Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The defendant appealed the conviction, and on June 29, 2006, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment and sentence. (C.A. No. 05-10176).
Upon a person's conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1425, the court "shall thereupon revoke, set aside, and declare void the final order admitting such person to citizenship, and shall declare the certificate of naturalization of such person to be canceled." 8 U.S.C. § 1451(e). The trial court has jurisdiction to effectuate this provision, and that jurisdiction lasts beyond the pendency of the case. United States v. Inocencio, 328 F3d 1207, 1210 (9th Cir. 2003). Furthermore, the court "shall make an order canceling such certificate and shall send a certified copy of such order to the Attorney General." 8 U.S.C. § 1451(f). Revocation of naturalization under § 1451 is mandatory. United States v. Inocencio, 328 F3d at 1209. The court may further order surrendered the certificate of naturalization to the Attorney General. 8 U.S.C. § 1451(f).
The pendency of an appeal does not divest the district court of jurisdiction to effectuate these mandatory provisions. United States v. Maduno, 40 F.3d 1212, 1218 (11th Cir. 1994) (cited in United States v. Inocencio, 328 F3d at 1209). The defendant has no right to notice or an opportunity to respond before naturalization is revoked. United States v. Inocencio, 328 F.3d at 1211.
The undersigned has learned from the Department of Homeland Security that the language in the attached proposed order will ensure that the defendant's denaturalization is effectuated.
IT IS ORDERED THAT the defendant is forever restrained and enjoined from claiming any rights, privileges, or advantages under any document which evidences Unite States citizenship obtained as a result of the defendant's naturalization on May 31, 2001.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the defendant surrender and deliver his Certificate of Naturalization (Certificate No. 26768818) (if he has not already done so), and any copies thereof in his possession (and to make good faith efforts to recover and then surrender any copies thereof that he knows are in possession of others), to the Attorney General immediately; and also return immediately to the Attorney General any other indicia of United States citizenship, and any copies thereof in his possession (and to make good faith efforts to recover and then surrender any copies thereof that he knows are in the possession of others), including, but not limited to, United States ...