Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Secure Investment Services

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 10, 2009

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SECURE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.; AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; LYNDON GROUP, INC.; KIMBERLY SNOWDEN; AND LINDA NEUHAUS, IN HER CAPACITY AS THE ADMINISTRATOR AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD NEUHAUS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT KIMBERLY SNOWDEN'S CONTINUANCE REQUEST

On March 4, 2009, Defendant Kimberly Snowden ("Snowden") filed a document in which she requested continuance of the scheduled March 9, 2009, hearing on Plaintiff's summary judgment motion. However, Snowden never filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 78-230(c) prescribes: "No party shall be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." The motion was submitted by a Minute Order filed on March 4, 2009. Since Snowden has not provided sufficient reason justifying scheduling a new hearing date, her continuance request is denied.

20090310

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.