Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Oldham v. California Department of Corrections

March 12, 2009

RONALD ROSCOE OLDHAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET. AL., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anthony W. Ishii Chief United States District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Document Nos. 7, 9, 10, 11)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 20, 2009, the Complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint by February 25, 2009. Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint and the order dismissing the complaint was returned as undeliverable.

Additionally, on January 20, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending denial of Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief and discovery. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Further, since Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, it is appropriate to close this case.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 20, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief and discovery are denied; and

3. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090312

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.