IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 12, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT,
JAIME LEYVA-HERNANDEZ, MOVANT.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Movant is proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Movant had been released from prison. Therefore, on February 25, 2009, the court ordered movant to show cause within ten days why this action should not be dismissed as moot. Movant was informed that failure to respond to the order to show cause would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Movant has not responded to the order to show cause.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
1. Movant's application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (#18) be dismissed; and
2. The clerk of the court be directed to close the companion civil case No. CIVS-05-0351 GEB KJM P.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.