Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Armentero v. Kramer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 12, 2009

LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MATTHEW KRAMER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 29, 2008, he filed a motion for judgment and sanctions, arguing that defendant Taylor had failed to comply with the court's order of December 12, 2008. In that order, however, defendant Taylor was given thirty days in which to file a motion for summary judgment; that motion was in fact filed on January 12, 2009.

On February 17, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion for law library access, contending that he could not make copies of his opposition to the motion for summary judgment because he has not been given adequate time in the law library. The court will treat this as a motion for an extension of time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for judgment (docket no. 47) is denied; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (docket no. 49) is granted and plaintiff is given an additional thirty days from the date of this order in which to file his opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Defendant's reply, if any, is due twenty days after the opposition is filed.

20090312

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.