Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Earl v. Nielson Media Research

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 12, 2009

CHRISTINE EARL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
NIELSON MEDIA RESEARCH, INC., DEFENDANT.

ORDER

Plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents (docket no. 54) came on regularly for hearing March 11, 2009. Mathew Stephenson appeared for plaintiff. Matthew Ruggles and Adrianne Samms appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon review of selected portions of the rough draft of the deposition transcript of Bob Dimond lodged by counsel, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The motion to compel is denied except as follows. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, defendant shall provide a supplemental affidavit of Mr. Sowatske in which declarant verifies the nature and extent of the search he conducted or arranged to have conducted in the course of producing documents in response to the requests at issue.

2. The motion for monetary sanctions is denied.

20090312

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.