Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Navarro v. Sears Life Insurance Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 12, 2009

RITA NAVARRO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SEARS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER*fn1

Plaintiff seeks to amend her Complaint to add a negligence claim, and Market USA Inc. as a Defendant. Defendant Sears Life Insurance Company filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Since the motion is unopposed the question of whether Plaintiff has shown "good cause" to amend the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order ("Scheduling Order") is not reached and the motion is granted.

Plaintiff has five days from the date on which this Order is filed to file and serve her First Amended Complaint; a copy of this Order shall be served on Defendant Market USA Inc. at the same time as service of process. Further, the added Defendant shall have 30 days after said service within which to file a "Notice of Proposed Modification of the Scheduling Order."


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.