Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Amanjee v. Chertoff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 13, 2009

SARATHY S. AMANJEE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled civil action seeking relief from the delay in adjudicating their applications for adjustment to permanent resident status. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On February 11, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Defendants filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations, and plaintiffs filed a timely reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 11, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' May 7, 2008 amended motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Doc. No. 8) is denied.

20090313

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.