Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Clinton v. California Dep't of Corrections

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 13, 2009

THOMAS CLINTON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are two motions for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's September 16, 2008 order (Docs. 197 and 204).

As plaintiff has already been made aware, Eastern District of California Local Rule 72-303(b) states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within ten days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties." Plaintiff has already moved for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's order, and was informed that his motion was untimely. Plaintiff has now filed two additional motions for reconsideration of the same magistrate judge's order. The motions are untimely, and will be denied. Any further motions for reconsideration of this order will be disregarded.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions for reconsideration (Docs. 197, 204) are denied as untimely.

20090313

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.