Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Chavez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 16, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JORGE CHAVEZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. William B. Shubb

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

The parties request that the status conference currently set for March 23, 2009, be continued to March 30, 2009 and stipulate that the time beginning March 23, 2009, and extending through March 30, 2009, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for each defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv); Local Code T4.

The parties are in the process of discussing and negotiating the various plea offers in this case. Each defendant will need time to consider his or her offer in light of the discovery. As such, the attorneys for each defendant need more time to review the discovery in this case, discuss that discovery with their respective clients, consider new evidence that may affect the disposition of this case, conduct necessary legal research and investigation, and then discuss with their clients how to proceed. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Dated: March 13, 2009

ORDER

For the reasons stated above, the status conference in case number CR. S-07-0515 WBS, currently set for March 23, 2009, is continued to March 30, 2009 at 8:30 a.m.; and the time beginning March 23, 2009, and extending through March 30, 2009, is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act for effective defense preparation. The Court finds that interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090316

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.