IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 17, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5205 BEAR CREEK ROAD, GARDEN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, EL DORADO COUNTY, APN: 062-420-40, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, AND APPROXIMATELY $37,750.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
STIPULATION TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER THEREON [PROPOSED]
DATE: March 30, 2008
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
Plaintiff United States of America and claimant Rollie Trout, Scharlynn Trout, stipulate that a stay is necessary in the above-entitled action, and request that the Court enter an order staying all further proceedings pending the outcome of a related criminal case now pending in El Dorado County (People v. Rollie William Trout and Scharlynn Trout, El Dorado County No. P08CRF0018). Plaintiff provided the attorney for claimant/lienholder Washington Mutual Bank ("WaMu") with a draft of this stipulation today, but has learned that counsel is in mediation all day and has not yet had an opportunity to review this stipulation. While counsel for the United States cannot represent to the Court that WaMu's counsel will in fact join in this stipulation, undersigned counsel believe that claimants Rollie and Sharlynn Trout are making the payments on WaMu's loan, and that therefore WaMu will not object to the extension of the stay.
This stipulation is based on the following:
1. Counsel for plaintiff contacted the El Dorado County District Attorney's Office on March 15, 2009, and was advised that a trial setting conference is now scheduled for April 3, 2009, in the criminal action against claimants Rollie and Scharlynn Trout.
2. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1), (g)(2) and 21 U.S.C. § 881(i) the parties suggest that a stay of further proceedings in this case is necessary. The United States contends that the defendant real property was used to facilitate a violation of federal drug laws (possession with intent to distribute marijuana) and is therefore forfeitable to the United States. The United States intends to depose the Trouts about the claims they filed in this case and the facts surrounding the presence of over 37 pounds of processed marijuana on the defendant property. If discovery proceeds, claimants would be placed in the difficult position of either invoking their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and losing the ability to protect their interest in the defendant property, or waiving their Fifth Amendment rights and submitting to depositions and potentially incriminating themselves in the pending criminal matter. If claimants invoke their Fifth Amendment rights, the United States will be deprived of the ability to explore the factual basis for the claims they filed in this action and the defenses raised in their Answers.
3. In addition, if this case is not stayed claimants will attempt to depose law enforcement officers who were involved in the execution of the state search warrant at the defendant property. Allowing depositions of these officers would adversely affect the ability of the El Dorado County authorities to conduct its related criminal prosecution.
4. Accordingly, the parties contend that proceeding with this action at this time has potential adverse affects on the prosecution of the related criminal case and/or upon claimants' ability to prove their claim to the property and to contest the government's allegations that the property is forfeitable. For these reasons, the parties request that this matter be stayed for a period of six months. At that time the parties will advise the Court whether a further stay is necessary.
5. While this case is stayed claimants agree to keep current all payments due to claimant Washington Mutual Bank under the promissory note dated June 23, 2003, in the original principal amount of $80,300.00, and secured by the deed of trust recorded in El Dorado County on July 1, 2003, encumbering the defendant property. If claimants default on the promissory note (as "default" is defined in the promissory note), claimants will not object to a request by plaintiff or claimant Washington Mutual Bank for an order permitting an interlocutory sale of the defendant property in accordance with Rule G(7)(b) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.
DATED: March 16, 2009
LAWRENCE G. BROWN Acting United States Attorney
KRISTIN S. DOOR Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for plaintiff
DATED: March 16, 2009
JOHN BALAZS Attorney for claimants Rollie and Scharlynn Trout
DATED: SCOTT J. STILMAN
SCOTT J. STILLMAN Attorney for claimant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., an acquirer of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank from the FDIC acting as receiver ORDER Good cause having been shown, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for March 30, 2009, is continued to June 15, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. The parties shall submit a joint scheduling report fourteen days prior to the hearing and will advise the Court whether a further stay is necessary.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.